Re: SmilingSynic's ES journal--observations and trades
Vertigo,
Long NQ at 1405; target 1521.
Moved sell limit to 1446.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Vertigo,
Long NQ at 1405; target 1521.
Moved sell limit to 1446.
great observations, smilingsynic.
I made no trades today, just watched.
Teach at George Washington, but only one class and sort of one the side so I still have time other days of the week
. I teach that one class and oversee the trading room they have there so I am outside the world of department chairs and faculty meetings and such but I do see how time consuming they can be. My co-author is Department Chair and I see the BS he deals with. As for grading papers, I have 24 right now from undergrads that forgot how to write analytically lol.
I know it is off topic but would love to hear what subject/class you do teach ![]()
optioncoach wrote:SS you teach college or high school level? 5% drawdown for a month will make some of the major hedge funds jealous who lost that in a day.
Hi, Phil
I am a full professor and department chair at a small state university (much smaller than Georgetown, which is where you are, right?).
Trading while teaching was no problem, as I taught only two classes in person (two others I taught online) but being department chair and professor is just too much. I am only "interim" department chair, but I am dealing with all of the problems that a permanent chair would. You would not believe how much work it is managing the egomaniacs; the only reason I am doing it is because the university has always been good to me, and they were there for me when my wife had to quit her job to care for my disabled child. Since they were there for me, I want to be there for them now, but it is costing me.
No, I don't teach finance. If I did, I might be like the other hedge funds--waaayyy down.
I teach history.
Just got out of a meeting, and am going home sick. Feeling very run down, and like something is coming.
A few observations:
1. 1077 is a key number for the week. If the market cannot sustain a rally above that today, then there will likely be a retest.
Why 1077? That was the RTH open on Monday. Traders often use opening range breakout for day trading only, but I have seen evidence to suggest that the open for the week serves as a pivot for trading the rest of the week, and that the open for the month serves as a pivot for the rest of the month.
2. If there is a retest, I will be looking for sells on the way down to the 1004-1005 area, if I am able to trade intraday. Wyckoff spring, perhaps, at around 1000.
3. If I end up getting full-blown sick, I will be looking at the TV and not the screens. I'll place orders overnight. I am unable to post here from at home, so I'll almost certainly not be adding to this the rest of the day.
Be careful out there.
Last edited by SmilingSynic (2008-10-07 07:04:11)
Back in summer Jul 2002, frantic clients kept the phones ringing wondering when would the selling
end. I looked at 1987 crash to generate data that pinpointed (within 1 day), the Jul, 2002 low. I
don't have that report, but I remember the basis of the calculation,
Please do not post this anywhere.
I can't do the following calculation on the ES because I have real problems believing the continuous
contract prices (ES) generated by Trade Station, so I am using the SPX cash.
But a simple measure of envelopes of normalcy is calc price divided by 200sma of price from previous day (on a percentage basis).
like this
measurement = ((C/average(C[1],200)-1)*100
the "*100" makes it a whole number in terms of expressing percentage move.
At the July bottom in 2002, SPX cash was 26.98% below its 200sma (200sma calculated as of previous day's close, that's what the "C[1]" represents in the formula)
Yesterday, 10/07/08, as of the close, SPX was 24.84% below its 200sma[1].
when I solve for a 26.98% drop below 200sma, equivalent move would be cash print/close 966.16. for today,Wednesday, 10/8/2008.
Estimate for a low print (if we mimicked 2002 Price Action)
these are measurements of extreme envelopes of selling induced by fear. This is a measurement of the last time markets experienced the Frank Burns (M*A*S*H), "SELL EVERYTHING AT MARKET REGARDLESS OF PRICE!) fear induced selling.
we are in the ballpark of a short-term bottom today,10/8/2008
Certainly (in my opinion, not the bottom, but a tradeable bottom).
To get an idea of what downside intraday risk for today and tomorrow would be, the formula can be
re-written using Low to replace the first C in the formula above.
solving for that, low print for today (if we mimicked July 2002 intraday cash action) would be
equivalent to an intraday low print ON THE CASH, of 964, tomorrow would be 940.76 low print. (This is only if we mimicked the 2002 drop, it's hypothetical, this whole thing could unfold today.)
so we could see a recovery intraday,
Back in Jul, 2002 there was still some emotional spillover on the following day, which would be
roughly equivalent to a low print SPX cash for tomorrow of 940 area. (940.76).
History never repeats exactly. These are only numbers that represented an equivalent / similar move relative to the drop back in 2002 (and 1987 was my model for 2002), does this apply to today's markets? (for me YES, but truly, I don't know and you don't know. I am putting on long positions with 1/3 size)
What else do you have to go on?
Considering how much faster price moves are now, this could all unfold today.,
BTW, in 2002, 7/24/02, the rebound day, that was the day after the Jul 23 low close; Jul 24, 2002
saw a gain of 8.7% from the it's low that day (the emotional spillover selling low).
the close on 7/24/02(the rebound day) represented a gain of 5.7% from the close of 7/23/02
Back in 2002, market was net positive for 6 trade days for a closing gain (from close of lowest close
day, Jul23, to close of 7/31/02) of 14%, then retraced a little more than 50% over the next 3 trade
days before taking off again, the second leg higher lasted for another 13 trade days,
that second leg to the upside, the final 13 day lift, represented a gain of roughly 15% from the
retracement low.
The entire rally, from the 7/23/2002 close to the 8/22/2002 close represented a 20.6% gain. The
entire run was a 22 trade day net positive move.
***Reminder of historical studies, study of 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after presidential election
day (I did this study, my memory is pretty good, but I can't remember whether it was 2 weeks after
election day or 4 weeks after election day. either way, historically, best performance came by
buying the close of the 6th trade day BEFORE pres election day. Equivalent this year Means Buy close
of Friday, October 24th.
I don't know what's going to happen and neither do you. If you have something better than this, post
it.
Fear is FEAR. These are only measures of the price swing relative to the 200 day simple moving
average of price that marketd the end of selling at one point in time in July 2002. It's enough for
me.
*******************
Please do not post this anywhere.
I'm back at the office. I'm still sick, but I am a workaholic, what can I say? The market the way it is, I cannot afford to be in bed.
The only trade I made yesterday afternoon was to dump 2 ES at 1048.25, when it failed at yesterday's PP. I bought them both back at 1004.50 at the end of the day.
I posted this at ET last night. Here is how I see the so-called "big picture":
"Several months ago I said 1150, but that level barely put up a fight.
They are ultimately, within the next twelve months, taking it to the bear market low of 2002,. Yes, a full retrace.
That would be right around 770 on the S&P, around a 23% additional drop from here.
900 as a short term bottom, maybe, but I would say 960 is a better guess.
Yes, I said GUESS.
1150 is now resistance.
960 to 1150 would be a 190 point move, and then 380 (190 X 2) down from there would be around 770."
How am I using this?
First, I am not adding to any positions. I have enough exposure. I have the funds to add, but that would not be prudent money management. I started too soon--I readily admit that.
No, I did not add anything in the 960's. I have built my position, and the long-term stuff will be dumped above 1100 up to 1150.
At around 1150 I will reload and will build a short position looking for 800 first, and then a touch of October 2002 lows. Not sure yet how I will build it, but OTM time spreads and ultra short ETFs are at the top of my list right now.
today's low will hold into Q1'09
today's low will hold into Q1'09
I tend to agree.
At least three people have migrated to fattail from ET since I said that I was moving over here.
Any finders fee, segv? (LOL)
not if you bring B1S2 lol who always is first in line with his stops..
What I see:
1. A retest of yesterday's low, and then high. If I did not have a full position, I'd be buying at 971 and holding and looking first for R1, which is 1014.50, and then yesterday's high of 1027.25. Odds are, all three will be tested.
2. If 970 does not serve as support, but merely as a rest stop, I see 958-960 aas next. If the 1027 area does not serve as resistance, but merely as a rest stop, the next target will be the 1070's, which is where I have my sell orders for the ES.
3. The SSO and QLD are longer-term positions and will be held until 1150, at this point.
4. I have a small UYG (1550), IYR (400), and ICF (400) position that I did not post, since it is not index-related. Those were bought based on an ETF system that I wrote last year. Considering that it made money in short XLE during the bull run on crude, I have confidence that it is robust.
Sell limit orders on UYG at 15 and change.
IYR, 58 and change
ICF, 68 and change.
Good til cancelled
Good luck to all
If it fails at the pivot (992.75--right now), then 972.
If the pivot holds, then 1014.
Pivot is being tested again, right now.
A strong bounce suggests a strong rally.
EDIT: Clearly a tug of war. NQ strength favors the bulls, but intraday trading absolutely requires stops, esp in this schizo market.
Last edited by SmilingSynic (2008-10-09 06:19:50)
In this business, at one time or another.
Everybody plays the fool
There is no exception to the rule
Overnight gap will be filled at 980.25
Gap filled, and retest of 971 imminent.
Retest, but a slightly higher low.
Taylor, from the Taylor book method, considered that bullish.
SSynic, from fattail, likes Taylor, but Taylor isn't trading this market. Synic, who is, waits and sees.
Last edited by SmilingSynic (2008-10-09 06:49:47)
Higher low, no go.
I have to leave for the next 1 hour and a half to proctor a test (professor called in sick).
Retest imminent.
The way the market is hanging around the pivot today suggests that at least one more downside day of pain is to be expected.
Nevertheless, there will probably be at least a token effort to retest 998 at least one more time today, and maybe even the day's high of 1010, but it would take some shocking unexpected news event to get it 1025.
What I see:
2. If 970 does not serve as support, but merely as a rest stop, I see 958-960 aas next. If the 1027 area does not serve as resistance, but merely as a rest stop, the next target will be the 1070's, which is where I have my sell orders for the ES.
Good call on 960 SPX hit 960 it was the 082202 high on that hump
If yesterday's low holds, there would be a head and shoulders intraday over the past two days.
SmilingSynic wrote:What I see:
2. If 970 does not serve as support, but merely as a rest stop, I see 958-960 aas next. If the 1027 area does not serve as resistance, but merely as a rest stop, the next target will be the 1070's, which is where I have my sell orders for the ES.
Good call on 960 SPX hit 960 it was the 082202 high on that hump
Thanks--didn't know that. Came to 960 through another means.
Descending triangle off of yesterday's low.
960?
(c) 2007 - 2009 fattail.org
Currently installed 2 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.
[ Generated in 0.124 seconds, 7 queries executed ]